www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Henri Yandell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-289) ACE license
Date Mon, 06 Feb 2017 16:29:41 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15854296#comment-15854296
] 

Henri Yandell commented on LEGAL-289:
-------------------------------------

That's not the criteria we have been working under. The criteria we have been working under
say "The license must meet the Open Source Definition".

Are you saying we must remove all non OSI approved licenses from category A?

> ACE license
> -----------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-289
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-289
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Anthony Baker
>
> The Apache Geode project would like to include ACE as a bundled dependency in a binary
convenience artifact.  Can you review the ACE license at http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE-copying.html?
 It looks somewhat BSD-ish to me.
> Should the referenced license be added to the list of approved licenses?
> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved#category-a
> Thanks for the help!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message