www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jim Jagielski (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-289) ACE license
Date Wed, 08 Feb 2017 19:18:41 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15858413#comment-15858413
] 

Jim Jagielski commented on LEGAL-289:
-------------------------------------

You wrote: They are the authority on the "Open Source Definition".

Yes, that is true.

One of our criteria is: "The license must meet the Open Source Definition."

So who is the authority on what meets the OSD? The authorities on the OSD: OSI.

Everyone is free to campaign to overrule me on this.

> ACE license
> -----------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-289
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-289
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Anthony Baker
>
> The Apache Geode project would like to include ACE as a bundled dependency in a binary
convenience artifact.  Can you review the ACE license at http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE-copying.html?
 It looks somewhat BSD-ish to me.
> Should the referenced license be added to the list of approved licenses?
> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved#category-a
> Thanks for the help!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message