www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jim Jagielski (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-289) ACE license
Date Wed, 08 Feb 2017 17:24:41 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15858271#comment-15858271
] 

Jim Jagielski commented on LEGAL-289:
-------------------------------------

As mentioned, what is there is there. I have no desire to move anything off catA due to not
being an OSI approved license at this time. That does not mean that we need to continue to
allow non-OSI approved licenses based on how something looks or smells.

> ACE license
> -----------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-289
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-289
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Anthony Baker
>
> The Apache Geode project would like to include ACE as a bundled dependency in a binary
convenience artifact.  Can you review the ACE license at http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE-copying.html?
 It looks somewhat BSD-ish to me.
> Should the referenced license be added to the list of approved licenses?
> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved#category-a
> Thanks for the help!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message