www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jim Jagielski (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-289) ACE license
Date Tue, 07 Feb 2017 21:21:42 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15856816#comment-15856816
] 

Jim Jagielski commented on LEGAL-289:
-------------------------------------

"Are you saying we must remove all non OSI approved licenses from category A?"

Did I say that? No.

Until ACE is OSI approved, we should not use it unless and until it is certified by OSI as
being OSD compliant or until Henri puts up his property as collateral for his layman assessment
of "Seems cat-A"

> ACE license
> -----------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-289
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-289
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Anthony Baker
>
> The Apache Geode project would like to include ACE as a bundled dependency in a binary
convenience artifact.  Can you review the ACE license at http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE-copying.html?
 It looks somewhat BSD-ish to me.
> Should the referenced license be added to the list of approved licenses?
> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved#category-a
> Thanks for the help!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message