Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7BBA200C02 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 15:46:27 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id C65C9160B48; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:46:27 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 1AE20160B39 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 15:46:26 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 70296 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2017 14:46:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 70286 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2017 14:46:26 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:46:26 +0000 Received: from Prometheus2.local (unknown [193.104.215.11]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 959481A06AA for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:46:25 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Writing spec code for the OSGi Alliance within the ASF To: legal-discuss@apache.org References: <8ede9f59-7647-8373-0e13-641c932bd415@apache.org> From: Carsten Ziegeler Message-ID: Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 15:46:23 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; de; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:46:28 -0000 Guillaume Nodet wrote > > > 2017-01-20 15:02 GMT+01:00 Carsten Ziegeler >: > > Guillaume Nodet wrote > > Ok, there are two more specific questions: > > > > #1 Can a committer write *new* code at the ASF with a header file > > mentioning the code is copyrighted to the OSGi Alliance ? > > Just to set the facts straight here: no one is writing code at the ASF > with a header file containing the copyright of the OSGi Alliance. > So I think this question is not relevant and the title of this thread is > really misleading. > > > > Well, that's precisely what I'd like to make sure. > For example, see this latest commit: > > https://github.com/apache/felix/commit/2d6f7011a7060f4397bb551d18d9f616ca532f38 > It modifies the org.osgi.util.converter package, where the files have > a "Copyright (c) OSGi Alliance (2016). All Rights Reserved." in their > headers. > If the code is not developped within the ASF, there must be a different > source somehwere else. Where does this change come from ? > Yes, the source of that code is the OSGi Alliance. That's where David developed the changes and once done copied them over to our repo. But this code has not been developed at the ASF. The svn commit does not show you that this is a copy as it always just does a diff. And this happens with every API development from the OSGI Alliance: it's developed in the repository of the Alliance and not anywhere else. Regards Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler Adobe Research Switzerland cziegeler@apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org