www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Pepijn Noltes (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-286) Apache Celix optional module with a LGPL dependency
Date Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:20:26 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15834216#comment-15834216

Pepijn Noltes commented on LEGAL-286:

[~bayard] Thanks for the comment. It is possible to close this issue? Then Celix can more
forward with accepting the donation.

> Apache Celix optional module with a LGPL dependency
> ---------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LEGAL-286
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-286
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Pepijn Noltes
> The Apache Celix project is in the process of accepting a donation which implements a
service oriented publish subscribe mechanism. The publish subscribe feature will be an optional
feature for Apache Celix. 
> The donation contains two transport implementations one based on multicast UDP and one
based on zeromq (http://zeromq.org). 
> The question is:
> Can Apache Celix release and distribute a optional module “PubSubAdmin ZMQ” which
uses the zeromq library (LGPL) to create a service oriented  publish subscribe mechanism?
> The zeromq library itself will not be distributed by Apache Celix and will be considered
a system requirement when the “PubSubAdmin ZMQ” option is selected. 
> When looking at the Previously Asked Questions [1] and Draft and out of date, but mentioned
as guidance, Third Party Licensing Policy [2] (specifically the part of system requirements)
I get the impression that this is acceptable. This is more or less confirmed in LEGAL-279
> The donation will also need an IP clearance and when looking at the IP clearance template
[4] I got a bit confused. Specifically the text: “Check and make sure that all items depended
upon by the project is covered by one or more of the following approved licenses: Apache,
BSD, Artistic, MIT/X, MIT/W3C, MPL 1.1, or something with essentially the same terms.” 
> Hopefully with this question we can remove the uncertainty.
> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#optional
> [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site/trunk/archive/legal/3party.mdtext
> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-279
> [4] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message