www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Adding BSD 4-clause to Category X List?
Date Fri, 13 Jan 2017 05:37:14 GMT
That's the one :)

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 5:16 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
wrote:

> I just want to confirm - when we say BSD-4-Clause we're talking about this:
>
> https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-4-Clause.html
>
> I'm going to update tonight.
>
> - John
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 1:43 PM Phil Odence <podence@blackducksoftware.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The SPDX group is committed to maintaining these URLs. So, I agree with
>> my friend Henri, SPDX links are cool.
>>
>> Phil Odence
>>
>> SPDX Workgroup Chair
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Henri Yandell <bayard@apache.org>
>> *Reply-To: *"legal-discuss@apache.org" <legal-discuss@apache.org>
>> *Date: *Wednesday, January 11, 2017 at 1:28 PM
>> *To: *ASF Legal Discuss <legal-discuss@apache.org>
>> *Subject: *Re: Adding BSD 4-clause to Category X List?
>>
>>
>>
>> SPDX links are cool. Would be good for this one.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 7:39 AM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 9:27 AM Shane Curcuru <asf@shanecurcuru.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Henri Yandell wrote on 1/10/17 1:10 AM:
>> > Reminder to make it clear that by '4-clause BSD', we mean the
>> > advertising clause. I've seen other BSD derivatives with 4 clauses (how
>> > dare they!) that didn't have an advertising clause :)
>>
>> For cases where license name + version number isn't explicit and
>> unambiguous, perhaps we should use SPDX names?
>>
>> Is it this one?
>>
>>   https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-4-Clause.html
>>
>> Or do links to the OSI definitions of specific license text work better?
>>
>>
>>
>> I'll note that there is no OSI page for BSD 4 Clause.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> - Shane
>>
>> >
>> > Hen
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 5:59 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com
>> > <mailto:jim@jagunet.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     +1
>> >
>> >     > On Jan 7, 2017, at 4:24 PM, Justin Mclean
>> >     <justin@classsoftware.com <mailto:justin@classsoftware.com>>
wrote:
>> >     >
>> >     > Hi,
>> >     >
>> >     > Last time this was discussed I think it clear it should be
>> >     consider Category X. [1]
>> >     >
>> >     > Note there are exceptions like OpenSSL and and any 4 clause code
>> >     from the BSD. [2]
>> >     >
>> >     > Thanks,
>> >     > Justin
>> >     >
>> >     > 1.
>> >     https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/557a49d678809e2c543ef465dc36b2
>> bd02eb02fda3c484f204468e39@%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E
>> >     <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
>> 557a49d678809e2c543ef465dc36b2bd02eb02fda3c484f204468e39@%
>> 3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E>
>> >     > 2. ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change
>> >     <ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change>
>> >     > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------
>> >     > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
>> >     <mailto:legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org>
>> >     > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>> >     <mailto:legal-discuss-help@apache.org>
>> >     >
>> >
>> >
>> >     -----------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------
>> >     To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
>> >     <mailto:legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org>
>> >     For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>> >     <mailto:legal-discuss-help@apache.org>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> - Shane
>>   https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message