www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
Subject Re: Is GitHub forking subject to clause 4b?
Date Wed, 04 Jan 2017 01:04:03 GMT
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Luis Villa <luis@lu.is> wrote:
> No legal document ever written contains only intended ambiguity.* Part of
> what makes open legal work fruitful (and fun!) is the tradition of writing
> commentaries to help clarify ambiguities as we become aware of them.
>
> HTH-
> Luis
>
> * My favorite treatise on contract drafting contains multiple entire
> chapters just on specific sub-types of ambiguities, and the author's blog
> contains 2-3 dozen posts more about ambiguities and court cases stemming
> from them.

I'm binge watching Suits so I should probably stay out of this from now on ;-)

Thanks,
Roman (running away ducking ;-)).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message