Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52950200BC4 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 11:05:26 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 46ABD160B09; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 10:05:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D8DF160AEF for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 11:05:25 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 20586 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2016 10:05:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 20567 invoked by uid 99); 19 Nov 2016 10:05:23 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 10:05:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E800BC0DC7 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 10:05:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.879 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eCcPFiv5V2Rw for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 10:05:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f182.google.com (mail-yw0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id C97FC5F36A for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 10:05:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw0-f182.google.com with SMTP id t125so178680652ywc.1 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 02:05:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2V2e5Sr9x0GcPBid7gM1MYoT+VgeXTG4IytLDnfM+iU=; b=RD2ub9v2cQLjfT0rlNGC5EtC+N4PKD7tMw+NYaiXHcZM2cPbhVcD0tyyJZQQyR5SmA WfdnILEY6jHbA2t3whoWntWfsMhhHaHEm2DeSKbsBLRxPO5bzzeRg54hLOgNEDVyg8D3 q3tJGosiZSe4MGIyrI5Px22bFlhBSWAcyrU2CJJrRUsPM0TaSNldHDT4zkzMGIOy4EPs gsIkhCf//tXISnPJOPuiHDivFGMBzmY5yUvRDBlLRyekZXUJnAw0OwxH6Fhte5zlcMO2 HoKKi0UIfyQfUas5et5hF/Ydi9BEEDWhGGt+rlU9h44jWzDA2HzmxLhcxA6bPc8VIVOu 77EQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=2V2e5Sr9x0GcPBid7gM1MYoT+VgeXTG4IytLDnfM+iU=; b=PsttSonjErEVPyZ+FphlTJsWu4/XvieJN9FmVGGroja+G5LD8kX9AtiqrWHokQsasb RkwKaAbQhaYrnjm/lKvUPzyBRjGH20Sb1HjJJrEF25MY2kr2r3vY2sEprdN/VnprD+MI tmiR4tffDZyKWFDCkRRFmgk/qgLraRTKvQuafeDvef4sgzTSiliz3+x5cKIYi9C/RTqk lbAaQvE8t1xRx7JHx0Er6MaKYE1wmbGWzPz5i0wdgbTKz2ey39Xv+zNuc1ie7jo7aljl qsWaN2c+haKs3LnvetaVjbxEqcdcWdhQhfnKv6lz3aIoHYfv+fqh5VuoKp3I6B9+gpxV X8PQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01u8XpInBS4eUbOMkS8WhmZHZCuMMPLGIdl21kdYPszbF1z3aYV4A8ue3g5bXIZrp1kJM3Qblk4F+acAQ== X-Received: by 10.13.199.193 with SMTP id j184mr3625617ywd.339.1479549905740; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 02:05:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.13.204.199 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 02:04:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <0F0D89DB-510B-4A37-B84A-264BAB800614@gmail.com> References: <476ACE75-31D5-4AF9-A5F2-195A1204DDC6@gmail.com> <5FC4EF64-0A51-403A-AA02-7664AD275E28@gmail.com> <7619EF27-63C5-4104-A1B2-719E4A654F10@gmail.com> <0F0D89DB-510B-4A37-B84A-264BAB800614@gmail.com> From: Ted Dunning Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 02:04:35 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: A grace period for getting rid of JSON license jars To: "legal-discuss@apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114e544a8f291c0541a48e74 archived-at: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 10:05:26 -0000 --001a114e544a8f291c0541a48e74 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Alan Gates wrote: > You did not answer the question of whether you're willing to go to dec 31 > or not. As you're the only one disagreeing with the later date, if you > agree to an earlier date I'd call that consensus. > > Can we please agree to a temporary date immediately so projects can > release while we keep arguing? If you don't like my temporary date please > suggest another. > Yes. December 31st sounds like a good date to me. I would also encourage projects that can do a clean release (if they release before then) to do so. I am willing to put in personal time to help make that possible. --001a114e544a8f291c0541a48e74 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Alan Gates <alanfgates@gmail.com= > wrote:
You did not answe= r the question of whether you're willing to go to dec 31<= /span> or not. As you're the only one disagreeing with the later date, = if you agree to an earlier date I'd call that consensus.=C2=A0

<= /div>
Can we please agree to a temporary date immediately so projects can rele= ase while we keep arguing?=C2=A0 If you don't like my temporary date pl= ease suggest another.=C2=A0

Yes.

December 31st sounds= like a good date to me. I would also encourage projects that can do a clea= n release (if they release before then) to do so.

I am willing to put in personal= time to help make that possible.

--001a114e544a8f291c0541a48e74--