Done.

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
Yep.
> On Nov 3, 2016, at 9:29 AM, Felix Meschberger <fmeschbe@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> Does that read „it is CatX“ ?
>
> Thanks
> Felix
>
>> Am 03.11.2016 um 13:48 schrieb Jim Jagielski <jim@apache.org>:
>>
>> In fact, I will go further: w/ my VP Legal hat on, I say
>> that the license is NOT CatA and is NOT approved.
>>
>>> On Nov 1, 2016, at 8:05 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> IMO, JSON should be moved. It is not a valid FSF nor OSI
>>> license. As such, it is not a true "open source" license
>>> and has no place as CatA.
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org