www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: A grace period for getting rid of JSON license jars
Date Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:52:51 GMT
Ted

Many thanks to you for taking that on - especially the twitter4j
contribution which is certainly an above and beyond gesture.

Joe

On Nov 20, 2016 6:43 PM, "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Alan, Joe, Andrew,
>
> I just pushed out version 1.1 of my clone. It has a few improvements based
> on experience changing twitter4j to be acceptable.  (thanks for Simon
> Lessard on this).
>
> I have also sent a pull request to the twitter4j folks. I don't understand
> how to run their tests, so my pull request could be considered incomplete.
> It does compile.
>
> The changes in version 1.1 are not functional (changed JSONException to
> unchecked, added constructors to JSONTokener and JSONException).
>
> The new version should land on central shortly.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 2:23 AM, Alan Gates <alanfgates@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Excellent. Thank you, and thanks for the offer to help.
>>
>> Alan.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Nov 19, 2016, at 11:04, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Alan Gates <alanfgates@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> You did not answer the question of whether you're willing to go to dec
>>> 31 or not. As you're the only one disagreeing with the later date, if
>>> you agree to an earlier date I'd call that consensus.
>>>
>>> Can we please agree to a temporary date immediately so projects can
>>> release while we keep arguing?  If you don't like my temporary date please
>>> suggest another.
>>>
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> December 31st sounds like a good date to me. I would also encourage
>> projects that can do a clean release (if they release before then) to do so.
>>
>> I am willing to put in personal time to help make that possible.
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message