www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org>
Subject Re: JSON license again
Date Thu, 03 Nov 2016 15:29:15 GMT
Done.

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:

> Yep.
> > On Nov 3, 2016, at 9:29 AM, Felix Meschberger <fmeschbe@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Does that read „it is CatX“ ?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Felix
> >
> >> Am 03.11.2016 um 13:48 schrieb Jim Jagielski <jim@apache.org>:
> >>
> >> In fact, I will go further: w/ my VP Legal hat on, I say
> >> that the license is NOT CatA and is NOT approved.
> >>
> >>> On Nov 1, 2016, at 8:05 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> IMO, JSON should be moved. It is not a valid FSF nor OSI
> >>> license. As such, it is not a true "open source" license
> >>> and has no place as CatA.
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
> >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
>

Mime
View raw message