www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: A grace period for getting rid of JSON license jars
Date Tue, 22 Nov 2016 19:15:31 GMT
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:48 AM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >> I can see how that could work for an individual case, but do we really
>> >> want to release a jar that *requires* the poms to be patched?
>> >
>> >
>> > I think that the patching is at the Apache project level.
>>
>> Yes, but every project that uses the new jar will need to consider
>> patching.

Be that as it may. We say "Don't use json.org." And we (maybe, rather,
Ted) suggest an alternative, which may have some problems attached to
it. But, that is (IMO) way better than just the "Don't" part.

Jochen


-- 
The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!"

http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message