www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: JSON license again
Date Thu, 03 Nov 2016 15:20:53 GMT
Yep.
> On Nov 3, 2016, at 9:29 AM, Felix Meschberger <fmeschbe@adobe.com> wrote:
> 
> Does that read „it is CatX“ ?
> 
> Thanks
> Felix
> 
>> Am 03.11.2016 um 13:48 schrieb Jim Jagielski <jim@apache.org>:
>> 
>> In fact, I will go further: w/ my VP Legal hat on, I say
>> that the license is NOT CatA and is NOT approved.
>> 
>>> On Nov 1, 2016, at 8:05 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> IMO, JSON should be moved. It is not a valid FSF nor OSI
>>> license. As such, it is not a true "open source" license
>>> and has no place as CatA.
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message