Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC782200BA4 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:46:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id CB87A160AF1; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 15:46:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 20A2E160AD9 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 17:46:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 6368 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2016 15:46:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 6329 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2016 15:46:01 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 15:46:01 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 262FCC03CC for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 15:46:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.821 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.821 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.de Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pc094bJ29Jm3 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 15:45:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm5-vm2.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm5-vm2.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.90.153]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 3B95B5F246 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 15:45:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.138.100.111] by nm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Oct 2016 15:45:57 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.160] by tm100.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Oct 2016 15:45:57 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1016.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Oct 2016 15:45:57 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 530404.18957.bm@omp1016.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: XOg3nhsVM1nVIpqFecVzi4hfsroirL_sm4Oack_4M67Cc6PY6KFwOaeVAyRavIR bwSNIjpBBDXO6Jo94vtjY99vcC.S1vNm5xX3QzmfkSyS36fBnrZvCuHutYe9KgI4CDgh7rPaDrWI GoajYJa6Mp53stHKroU6Tnjb6oc_5U6YAnW5ao1_ujgFENVWaCTHJwS2S1wrzcZGz7miE0fRV4jK lN2xjCppazAT9irTTU0wfBF.fmnP73E1x_AOTnuvKi50hlCzuZ2mMIthwwLaMOD_BbbgohjpDR11 UuPv23..gP_JtkZByc4qTR19UoyN2xoiChayQV8rq_gSK5Cudiko_FSo4lPwgGUWHptjW2fBYCo8 IHMNRB.4W7vjtUw6F1gm54TAszeNB2vRGd0D7XvP00Duy79yk69MyTFXWmLg4RInnKScHlBGiQa_ 3oXIAQ8U_HWJ7YtmUnPvG5AOvuGNWAAeqf5OqWwiLfIczAobK9EQN.z9uFkH4bEZ4MGP6QcLYOZk VhV.TX0eqoDzygCHdWg-- Received: from jws200070.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sendmailws106.mail.ne1.yahoo.com; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 15:45:57 +0000; 1476546357.079 Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 15:45:31 +0000 (UTC) From: Mark Struberg Reply-To: Mark Struberg To: "legal-discuss@apache.org" Message-ID: <1145618251.234105.1476546331440@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: NOTICE statements with original donations MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 15:46:04 -0000 afaik it's established practice to keep the original authors mentioned in the NOTICE after a code grant if they want it. e.g. https://github.com/apache/bval/blob/trunk/NOTICE LieGrue, strub > On Saturday, 15 October 2016, 17:42, sebb wrote: > > On 15 October 2016 at 14:51, John D. Ament wrote: > >> Suppose that Company X donates a project to the ASF. Is it OK for the >> resulting NOTICE to include a claim about the original donator, e.g. >> >> This product includes software originally developed by >> Company X (http://www.company-x.com/), Copyright 2001 - 20XX. > > NOTICE files need to be as minimal as possible. > So I think the question is: under what circumstances is it *necessary* > to include attribution in the NOTICE file? > I'm not sure it's possible to establish that without info on the > conditions (i.e. license) under which the donation was made. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org