www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sean Busbey (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-278) A change in license of JQuery
Date Tue, 18 Oct 2016 19:53:58 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15586498#comment-15586498

Sean Busbey commented on LEGAL-278:

Licenses apply to works. So it would be the license information applied to the work you actually
use. That means it depends on the artifacts you actually bundle, which should include a reference
for the license they are under (and hopefully they either don't just reference the website
URL or the ownership was such that we can trust in their ability to relicense).

> A change in license of JQuery
> -----------------------------
>                 Key: LEGAL-278
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-278
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Sathwik Bantwal Premakumar
> Hi,
> JQuery release 3.1.1 is under MIT 
> https://github.com/jquery/jquery/blob/3.1.1/LICENSE.txt
> The same github page also has a reference to website https://jquery.com/
> The license link on website https://jquery.com/ points to 
> https://jquery.org/license/    which seems now to be ASL 2.0
> We know that MIT and ASL are compatible.
> *The question is from which location does one pickup the license from?*
> *Do we always rely on the license under the source repository or from the referenced

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message