On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 4:40 AM, Shane Curcuru <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Roman Shaposhnik wrote on 9/19/16 10:05 PM:
>> I've always thought that Artistic/Perl license isn't
>> compatible with ALv2. But when I went and checked
>> I couldn't find it on the Cat X list:
>> in fact I couldn't find it at all on that page (aside from
>> an exception for auto-generated header files).
>> Am I misremembering it being on Cat X list?
> Has an Apache PMC asked to use it? We historically only add to the
> lists when a project asks to use a specific license. But yes, I'd agree
> it seems Cat X.
Yes. Apache HAWQ (incubating) would like to know. How difficult/costly is the
process to form a final opinion so we can document it?