Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928E9200B68 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 09:41:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 91469160AC0; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 07:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id DFAB9160A8E for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 09:41:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 57889 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2016 07:41:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 57874 invoked by uid 99); 19 Aug 2016 07:41:21 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 07:41:21 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FFB2C014D for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 07:41:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 07:41:20 +0000 (UTC) From: "Henri Yandell (JIRA)" To: legal-discuss@apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-267) Questionable use of third party code in major code contribution MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 07:41:22 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15427769#comment-15427769 ] Henri Yandell commented on LEGAL-267: ------------------------------------- The BSD license = that documented permission. Agreed however that fewer forks is generally a good thing and the ideal would be to rework the patch to make contributor's code independent of the ASM code. > Questionable use of third party code in major code contribution > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LEGAL-267 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-267 > Project: Legal Discuss > Issue Type: Question > Reporter: Benedikt Ritter > > Hello, > the Apache Commons project has received a major code donation via GitHub [1]. It looks like good parts of that contribution have been copied from the ASM framework which is licensed under the terms of BSD 3-Clause License. Given the information of the Previously Asked Questions page [3], I assume that we could theoretically include this contribution. > - Can you confirm, that we can accept this contribution from a legal PoV? > - What would be a polite way to bring this to Commons BCEL WRT to the ASM project? The contributor seems to be unrelated to ASM and has just copied the parts from ASM. Should we notify the ASM project ob this? > - The discussion at GitHub already brought up the topic of adding a NOTICE file. This seems to be missing in the PR. Is that all that needs to be done to include this contribution? > Thank you! > [1] https://github.com/apache/commons-bcel/pull/7 > [2] http://asm.ow2.org/ > [3] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org