www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Henri Yandell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Closed] (LEGAL-263) Boilerplate license acceptable for binary distribution?
Date Sun, 21 Aug 2016 20:49:20 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Henri Yandell closed LEGAL-263.
-------------------------------
    Resolution: Won't Fix

Closing.

This doesn't seem to relate to an Apache product (ie: the executable deliverable doesn't sound
like it's an Apache product), so the first info is that you should discuss the topic with
your own lawyers (ie: we don't provide legal advice).

I will note that it is common to include copies of Open Source licenses in mobile app attribution.


> Boilerplate license acceptable for binary distribution?
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-263
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-263
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Andrew W. Hill
>
> I'm distributing an executable deliverable, and in the "About" screen I list the 13 line
boilerplate from the bottom of http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.  However, in section
4a of the license I see that I'm obligated to "give" a copy of the license along with the
application.  Does this mean I should put the entire license into my About screen?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message