Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7B02009F3 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2016 22:50:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 8D28A160A26; Sat, 4 Jun 2016 20:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id D6AAF160A16 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2016 22:50:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 94575 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2016 20:50:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 94564 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2016 20:50:46 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 20:50:46 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 45CD61805A8 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2016 20:50:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.101 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gbiv.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zw1ZBfjWPr3d for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2016 20:50:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (sub5.mail.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.129]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 3A4035F4E4 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2016 20:50:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9631E4F805B for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2016 13:50:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=gbiv.com; bh=cqjxZ8r0+falT2UwJBECx6ft3S8=; b=jWUmcNWWm4WE/7yMDUv6k7knjndb O5wrxT9/uDqriOikmnzVSNxj7DluDeelWSq+CJe3+l7okKlySUIBIutphf4JL1Pd xc88Izx3iY93BTjgUIbR7Z10w1haBhsoBJI8Fgrzlk88D8tO1WlyS1AUmlgJ+Dmv zqixvAAW1uBQizQ= Received: from [192.168.1.2] (ip68-228-71-159.oc.oc.cox.net [68.228.71.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fielding@gbiv.com) by homiemail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B1894F8057 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2016 13:50:35 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: Dependency on OpenSSL From: "Roy T. Fielding" In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 13:50:34 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5EA502C6-CF9B-4DB5-83D5-25280DD9FE2E@gbiv.com> References: <749a6c00d2595a4b39533e26f4e5e0dc@mail.gmail.com> <4F6F8627-75FB-4611-A3D3-D7B1CD0B2575@classsoftware.com> To: legal-discuss@apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) archived-at: Sat, 04 Jun 2016 20:50:48 -0000 The advertising clause is subsumed by the AL2 NOTICE file when the = copyright owners are asked if the NOTICE file is sufficient advertising and they = agree. So far, everyone agreed, so we stopped asking a long time ago. We don't distribute under the advertising clause. We distribute under = AL2. ....Roy > On Jun 4, 2016, at 12:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey = wrote: >=20 > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:14 PM, William A Rowe Jr = wrote: >> All Advertising clauses are odious... that's why the OSS development = world >> went from copying them word for word to building new licensed that = forgo >> such a stupid requirement. >>=20 >> Unlike copy left, for example, the combined work is still able to be = applied >> in any scenario the developer wishes, which is the ASF's definition = of >> freedom. We never suggested the user has the freedom from observing = all >> applicable license terms, our own included. So this is obviously (to = most of >> us here) not category X. >=20 > The license categories are mainly about license subsumption[1]. >=20 > * Category A licenses are those which may be subsumed by the Apache > License 2.0. > * In principle, Category B licenses are those which may be subsumed = by the > Apache License 2.0 when only the object form is consumed. >=20 > "Subsumed" here means: >=20 > * Anyone who complies with all requirements of the ALv2 also = complies with > the requirements of license L. > * Everything permitted by the ALv2 is also permitted by license L. >=20 > (For more on combining licenses see Luis Villa's 2011 article[2].) >=20 > Restricting the licenses of dependencies to those which may be = subsumed by the > ALv2 allows the licensing of source releases and convenience binaries = to be > summarized as "Apache 2.0" -- even if the licensing is actually = polyglot. >=20 > Some of the licenses in "category B", e.g. Mozilla 2.0, have = notification > requirements such as pointing to source code. These requirements are = not in > the ALv2, but if a pointer to source code is included in NOTICE, then > satisfying the ALv2 by republishing NOTICE is enough to satisfy the > category B license's notification requirements. >=20 > But that is not true for the advertising clauses of BSD-4-clause or > Apache 1.0. And I am not the first person to raise this = objection[3][4][5]. >=20 > BSD-4-clause is not in category A nor is it in category B, and it = should not > be added to either category A or category B. >=20 > Marvin Humphrey >=20 > [1] https://s.apache.org/rguQ > [2] = https://opensource.com/law/11/9/mpl-20-copyleft-and-license-compatibility > [3] Sam Ruby: https://s.apache.org/H0vL > [4] Henri Yandell: https://s.apache.org/ysGm > [5] Richard Fontana: https://s.apache.org/pYKO >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org >=20 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org