www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "John D. Ament"<johndam...@apache.org>
Subject Re: EPL Dependency - Notice required?
Date Thu, 09 Jun 2016 11:21:11 GMT


On 2016-06-07 14:59 (-0400), Stian Soiland-Reyes <stain@apache.org> wrote: 
> No NOTICE should be required if you do not bundle/embed or distribute
> junit, a regular <dependency> is fine.
> 
> You should not need to make use <scope>provided, compile or test (normally)
> scope is OK, that's how many ASF Java projects do unit testing.

Stian,

Just to clarify, we use compile/provided scope as we are creating an extension to JUnit (other
areas of the project use JUnit to test).

Thanks for the clarification.

John

> On 7 Jun 2016 12:26 p.m., "John D. Ament" <johndament@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> Apache DeltaSpike has a compile-time dependency on junit for its test
> control module -
> https://github.com/apache/deltaspike/blob/master/deltaspike/modules/test-control/impl/pom.xml#L63
> 
> I was wondering, do we in fact need a NOTICE file calling out this
> dependency, since its Cat B (EPL)?  We mark it as provided, but
> realistically the module doesn't work without it.  So we're not providing
> the dependency, but do require a user to bring it.
> 
> John
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message