www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Dependency on OpenSSL
Date Fri, 03 Jun 2016 10:04:20 GMT
*head-explode*

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:

> Interestingly, while we seem to be discussing BSD 4-clause, I discovered
> that, according to Wikipedia [1], OpenSSL is under Apache 1.0, not BSD
> 4-clause, and when comparing OpenSSL's license [2] against this copy of
> Apache 1.0 [3], I'd have to agree.
>
> Even more interestingly, Apache 1.0 doesn't seem to be listed in [4] under
> Category A, B, or X either.  Is there some past ruling about Apache 1.0?
> I would hope Apache 1.0 is ok to use in Apache 2.0 projects.  And if it
> is, then it does raise questions about the categorization of the
> advertising clause in BSD 4-clause since Apache 1.0 has the same sort of
> clause.
>
> Thoughts?
> -Alex
>
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenSSL
> [2] https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html
> [3] https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-1.0
> [4] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
>
>

Mime
View raw message