www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: Dependency on OpenSSL
Date Mon, 06 Jun 2016 11:47:43 GMT
BSD-4 should be Cat-X *except* for those projects, such as OpenSSL, etc
that have agreed that NOTICE is sufficient.

> On Jun 6, 2016, at 1:23 AM, Marvin Humphrey <marvin@rectangular.com> wrote:
> 
> Roy, then Justin:
> 
>>> I did not mean OpenSSL, specifically. I meant the things we have included
>>> in our own packages that used to be under original BSD or AL 1.0.
>> 
>> So how do you recommend we change the current legal resolved questions to
>> make this clear ow to handle these licenses? Add them to category A but add
>> that they need to be called out in NOTICE?
> 
> The approach I hope we can take is to grandfather in harmless existing usage,
> including an exception for OpenSSL in particular, but explicitly deprecate
> licenses with advertising clauses to discourage future usage.
> 
> Marvin Humphrey
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message