www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Aditya Kishore (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-251) Can an Apache Project depend upon a binary-only dependencies available under a permissible license
Date Sun, 01 May 2016 05:36:12 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15265618#comment-15265618
] 

Aditya Kishore commented on LEGAL-251:
--------------------------------------

I apologies for missing details in my question, adding them now (in the description itself).



> Can an Apache Project depend upon a binary-only dependencies available under a permissible
license
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-251
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-251
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Aditya Kishore
>
> While researching on this, ran into many related queries and their answers but could
not find one which address this specifically.
> In one place, LEGAL-230, it appears it is okay to depend on a binary whose source code
is not published but is available under a permissible license.
> To ask it specifically, let's say if there is a binary version of a library, 'foo', available
under one of the permissible license but no source is available.
> In such case, can an Apache project
> # Have a compile time dependency on such binary?
> # Include this binary in its distribution?
> Thanks for your help!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message