www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ryan Blue (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-249) Use GitHub issues instead of JIRA
Date Sat, 14 May 2016 23:31:12 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15283721#comment-15283721
] 

Ryan Blue commented on LEGAL-249:
---------------------------------

bq. The original question was about GitHub Issues in contrast to using the ASF JIRA or an
ASF-hosted project Bugzilla.

I understand. The legal requirement is that ASF infrastructure has a record of the intent
to contribute. I think the context you're missing is that issue tracking systems are a way
to do this, because they have a record of a user posting a patch. It may not sound related
if you're thinking about pull requests as the primary method of contributing, but that is
(so far) the only legal concern that has been brought up about using GitHub issues instead
of JIRA.

> Use GitHub issues instead of JIRA
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-249
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-249
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Chris Riccomini
>
> Is it possible for us to use GitHub issues instead of JIRA for issue tracking and discussion?
This was raised on a new project that we're beginning to incubate (Airflow). I asked INFRA,
and they suggested that I ask LEGAL as well as the board.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message