www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bay...@apache.org
Subject svn commit: r1743707 - /infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext
Date Fri, 13 May 2016 17:40:26 GMT
Author: bayard
Date: Fri May 13 17:40:25 2016
New Revision: 1743707

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1743707&view=rev
Removing ? mark typo


Modified: infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext?rev=1743707&r1=1743706&r2=1743707&view=diff
--- infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext (original)
+++ infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext Fri May 13 17:40:25 2016
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ PMCs should use their judgement, err on
 ### Does the policy apply to binary/object files, such as executables or JAR files? ### {#faq-binaries}
 Yes.  Even if there are no source files within the release, the LICENSE file and NOTICE file
are still both required within 
-every ASF distribution -- whether the unit of distribution is a .jar, .msi, .tar/.?gz, .zip,
.exe installer, or any 
+every ASF distribution -- whether the unit of distribution is a .jar, .msi, .tar/.gz, .zip,
.exe installer, or any 
 other file format used for distributions.  For example, Windows .exe files must not be used
as a unit of distribution 
 unless they are installers and include the LICENSE and NOTICE files in their installation.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message