Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8836B196DC for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 13:48:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25365 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2016 13:48:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 25214 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2016 13:48:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 25203 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2016 13:48:52 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:48:52 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 668C1C0A88 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 13:48:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.179 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9_7uwGchsEIA for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 13:48:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com (mail-wm0-f68.google.com [74.125.82.68]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id DD4375F56F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 13:48:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id n3so4521355wmn.1 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 06:48:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to; bh=SMwLTI28EZKi0qKupJEAx+ONwJZ3+HrZrTZixfVacCE=; b=OkuvuxThwUtXmN/U76cfTRKs3lUAHtUDK0Zl7uOs+Vo5QIkQqHUpxMj0KdwTSg5/aX HwCTyrIAQOs9NkBw9OQd8i3LyaUOxUwYL7ajwxa/iFcgVXFVkJG56lTJwCh6kbr/yDAT 5r2l0Ro8kRJoLPXq1/hdSQjXidYP2ielF4cEZYjvOVqo7tPkybhNKNqRGOl9GpANXuft Tlt1vX/We934pzgjUuHUfsM6oY0NbWOEaBzoySVtlXcMj4m8fsmnmoRfqgL/34D7x+4M 9fwVbjNeZQpwdS3PCLcc4KowRxPAQq6Jw1AS1B9Owa+Z/6X+9ZKRjvET67RIEs74CMsf cLDA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :references:to:in-reply-to; bh=SMwLTI28EZKi0qKupJEAx+ONwJZ3+HrZrTZixfVacCE=; b=g4LDAezOp+DUm55r2z3n6YH1+jm6qW0l212VIiLjuxU/onvZFDvlNLNouXduFXHTME l5O1rkT/SeHHBbMloq+PK0FMPz5YnFUNDayeFTMm3hJ25zbpqy/vPvCuQAYXolV4cSWN 0dZeBdNV7+tfZfmlIxFL0k4nri68qnrahs7X3nB5fdxRqGZEvXLlQ1H3uIx1WVCaN2Zh 41jFALPAsxdI5WC8qEKtKs7/VqHnqkyXr8q2o7Twy+M325Hl2g3zD10IlT8HmQ1IAzmr +NTsXhvQAsPwyItp91GhfHwL3uE9tfGFMVpfKZuLRT4GpivZG1nB31moN8LoKG5Y9CUX qZqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLauGUnFyQ2FnBIae+DaZB1AdW50gg6T951Epq9uP+ih4ObWk4z/OdmE/Kv1W/ZSg== X-Received: by 10.28.58.77 with SMTP id h74mr3411913wma.82.1460123324429; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 06:48:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([185.120.125.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w79sm2116228wme.19.2016.04.08.06.48.43 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Apr 2016 06:48:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Harbs Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9B924E31-1DF4-4529-BD9F-BFA3E8744102" Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: Bundling and LICENSE Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 16:48:41 +0300 References: <56FF7667.5090006@apache.org> <5B932118-4F88-494D-92A4-7DD286E92362@classsoftware.com> <5700FAF1.4020609@apache.org> <0F9332C9-66FB-429A-BF9B-56E176D9B7B9@classsoftware.com> <5703D4F2.4080701@apache.org> <6A81F010-4877-4B57-B716-F800BD356668@apache.org> <5706131A.10009@apache.org> <567F916B-85EB-44E1-A4B7-2D825E924FF2@gmail.com> To: legal-discuss@apache.org In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) --Apple-Mail=_9B924E31-1DF4-4529-BD9F-BFA3E8744102 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 I=92ve been traveling, so I=92m pretty tired and so on, so finding = specific examples is difficult, but typically, the issues are: 1. Issues which existed in previous releases. 2. Issues which are inconsistencies in license and notice files in = third-party code which are declared as compatible. 3. Issues which are non clear-cut and might require discussion on = @legal. 4. Issues where real liability is next to impossible. What I understand from this thread is that we are expected to make = judgement calls on these issues, and when appropriate they can be = treated as bugs like any other bug and be fixed as appropriate following = a release. Harbs On Apr 8, 2016, at 7:43 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Could you point to some examples from previous releases? Might help to = understand the context here as to what are being proposed as = "non-critical". --Apple-Mail=_9B924E31-1DF4-4529-BD9F-BFA3E8744102 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 I=92ve = been traveling, so I=92m pretty tired and so on, so finding specific = examples is difficult, but typically, the issues are:
1. Issues = which existed in previous releases.
2. Issues which are = inconsistencies in license and notice files in third-party code which = are declared as compatible.
3. Issues which are non clear-cut = and might require discussion on @legal.
4. Issues where real = liability is next to impossible.

What I = understand from this thread is that we are expected to make judgement = calls on these issues, and when appropriate they can be treated as bugs = like any other bug and be fixed as appropriate following a = release.

Harbs

On Apr = 8, 2016, at 7:43 AM, Henri Yandell <bayard@apache.org> = wrote:

Could you point to some examples from = previous releases? Might help to understand the context here as to what = are being proposed as "non-critical".

= --Apple-Mail=_9B924E31-1DF4-4529-BD9F-BFA3E8744102--