www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Craig L Russell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-241) Is W3C Community Contributor License Agreement a Category-A license?
Date Thu, 10 Mar 2016 04:51:40 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15188674#comment-15188674

Craig L Russell commented on LEGAL-241:

There is some background here: https://www.w3.org/community/about/agreements/summary/

The licensing of W3C works is a two step process which involves two different licenses. 

W3C COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTOR LICENSE AGREEMENT (CLA) while the specification is under development

W3C COMMUNITY FINAL SPECIFICATION AGREEMENT once the specification is complete.

Maybe someone better versed in W3C operations can shed some light.

> Is W3C Community Contributor License Agreement a Category-A license?
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LEGAL-241
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-241
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Stian Soiland-Reyes
> In TAVERNA-932 we wonder if our use of https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-language/blob/0.15.0-incubating/taverna-robundle/src/main/resources/ontologies/oa.rdf
is considered Category-A license.
> Note that the upstream file https://www.w3.org/ns/oa/oa.rdf (which must be fetched with
{{curl -H Accept: application/rdf+xml}}) does not include file-headers - I added those based
on the [parent document|http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/20130208/index.html] which
> {quote}
> Copyright © 2012-2013 the Contributors to the Open Annotation Core Data Model Specification,
published by the Open Annotation Community Group under the W3C Community Contributor License
Agreement (CLA). A human-readable summary is available.
> {quote}
> It is a bit unclear what the license for downstream readers actually is, as that [W3C
Community Contributor License Agreement|https://www.w3.org/community/about/agreements/cla/]
is mainly written for W3C Community Group contributors (which incidentally includes myself).

> However it says contributions include:
> {quote}
> 2. Copyrights.
>     2.1. Copyright Grant. I grant to you a perpetual (for the duration of the applicable
copyright), worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, copyright license, without
any obligation for accounting to me, to reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display,
publicly perform, sublicense, distribute, and implement any Contribution to the full extent
of my copyright interest in the Contribution.
>     2.2. Attribution. As a condition of the copyright grant, you must include an attribution
to the Specification in any derivative work you make based on the Specification. That attribution
must include, at minimum, the Specification name and version number.
> {quote}
> which to me sounds like a permissive category-A BSD-like license.
> What is the view of LEGAL?

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message