www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Henri Yandell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Comment Edited] (LEGAL-236) CCLA vs SGA (clarification)
Date Thu, 18 Feb 2016 21:32:18 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15153145#comment-15153145
] 

Henri Yandell edited comment on LEGAL-236 at 2/18/16 9:32 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

Are the committers all listed on Google's CCLA? (assuming employed at Google)


was (Author: bayard):
Are the committers all listed on Google's CCLA?

> CCLA vs SGA (clarification)
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-236
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-236
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: James Malone
>
> I have a clarifying question for Apache Beam (incubating) so I can make sure we have
all of our ducks in a row.
> Google has a CCLA on file from their previous contribution of Wave. Additionally, all
committers on the project have signed CLAs at this point.
> Based on the docs (http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#submit-cla) it looks
like we should be covered. Since CLAs (individual and corporate) are all signed, an SGA is
not required, correct? I wanted to confirm that all needed legal agreements are in place properly.
> I ask here because we were (also) asked to sign an SGA as well but it seems to be duplicative
based on the current docs.
> Thanks!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message