www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Henri Yandell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Closed] (LEGAL-226) Do we need to include 3rd party licenses verbatim in our source distributions
Date Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:00:20 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Henri Yandell closed LEGAL-226.
-------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

Resolving per Sean's comment.

> Do we need to include 3rd party licenses verbatim in our source distributions
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-226
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-226
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Rick Hillegas
>
> The Spark developer community is discussing what kind of license information should be
included in Apache source distributions. The discussion began on http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Spark-1-5-1-RC1-td14310.html
and was moved to http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Discuss-NOTICE-file-for-transitive-quot-NOTICE-quot-s-td14326.html
> The two opinions seem to be:
> 1) It is sufficient for the NOTICE file to refer to licenses which are posted on 3rd
party websites.
> 2) The source distro needs to bundle verbatim copies of 3rd party licenses as is done,
for instance, by the THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME.txt in the JDK.
> We would appreciate any guidance you can give us.
> Thanks,
> -Rick



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message