www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org>
Subject Re: dependency on CDDL binary
Date Wed, 24 Feb 2016 01:09:32 GMT
On dual licensing:

As long as that's 'OR' rather than 'AND'.

Which with Jersey is the case.

On Tuesday, February 23, 2016, Jun Rao <junrao@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks everyone for responding. For now, we will add the CDDL license in
> our README.
>
> Also, just to confirm, Jersey is licensed under both CDDL and GPL. So, we
> can still have a binary dependency on Jersey as long as we label CDDL in
> README?
>
> Jun
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Henri Yandell <bayard@apache.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bayard@apache.org');>> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Marvin Humphrey <marvin@rectangular.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','marvin@rectangular.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','justin@classsoftware.com');>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > if for CDDL nothing goes in NOTICE then this means that this is not a
>>> > required 3rd party notice:
>>> >
>>> > "You must inform recipients of any such Covered Software in Executable
>>> form
>>> > as to how they can obtain such Covered Software in Source Code form in
>>> a
>>> > reasonable manner on or through a medium customarily used for software
>>> > exchange."
>>>
>>> I think it makes sense to treat the text which satisfies that passage as
>>> a
>>> "required notice".  (The literal text of that passage is not a "required
>>> notice" -- it's the link to the source code which *satisfies* the
>>> requirement
>>> spelled out in that passage which should be treated as a "required
>>> notice".)
>>>
>>
>> +1. A link to where to get the original source (given it's unmodified) in
>> the NOTICE or LICENSE.
>>
>> The link should (imo) be paired with the CDDL license text such that one
>> isn't removed without the other most likely being removed.
>>
>> Some options that jump to mind are having both in the LICENSE, a
>> THIRD_PARTY_LICENSE or foo.jar.license/foo.jar.notice (with the notice
>> there containing the required link).
>>
>> Hen
>>
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message