www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bay...@apache.org
Subject svn commit: r1731489 - /infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext
Date Sat, 20 Feb 2016 22:15:49 GMT
Author: bayard
Date: Sat Feb 20 22:15:49 2016
New Revision: 1731489

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1731489&view=rev
Log:
Moving short form question higher up

Modified:
    infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext

Modified: infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext?rev=1731489&r1=1731488&r2=1731489&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext (original)
+++ infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext Sat Feb 20 22:15:49 2016
@@ -160,6 +160,19 @@ A file without any degree of creativity
 copyright law; therefore, such a file does not require a license header.  If in doubt about
the extent of the
 file's creativity, add the license header to the file.
 
+###Is a short form of the source header available?
+
+Sometimes the situation of a file is such that the recommended Apache source header is not
appropriate. 
+Examples would be within images, minified JavaScript or PDFs. In those cases, the following
shorter 
+form may be used.
+
+    "Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more contributor license
agreements; and to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0. "
+
+Any additional licensing information relevant to the file (ie. that would ordinarily be in
the NOTICE) 
+should be noted directly in the file when the short form is used.
+
+If you have doubts as to whether the short form is appropriate for your situation, please
contact legal-discuss@.
+
 ### Does the policy apply to binary/object files, such as executables or JAR files? ### {#faq-binaries}
 Yes.  Even if there are no source files within the release, the LICENSE file and NOTICE file
are still both required within 
 every ASF distribution -- whether the unit of distribution is a .jar, .msi, .tar/.?gz, .zip,
.exe installer, or any 
@@ -185,18 +198,5 @@ including the right to copy, modify, and
 No.  This is strictly an ASF policy.  Other projects using the Apache License should still
refer to the 
 <a href="/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html#apply">license's appendix</a> for guidance
on applying a header to their source files.
 
-###Is a short form of the source header available?
-
-Sometimes the situation of a file is such that the recommended Apache source header is not
appropriate. 
-Examples would be within images, minified JavaScript or PDFs. In those cases, the following
shorter 
-form may be used.
-
- "Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more contributor license
agreements; and to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0. "
-
-Any additional licensing information relevant to the file (ie. that would ordinarily be in
the NOTICE) 
-should be noted directly in the file when the short form is used.
-
-If you have doubts as to whether the short form is appropriate for your situation, please
contact legal-discuss@.
-
 
   [1]: http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#required-third-party-notices



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message