Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB13518347 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 15:28:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79774 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2016 15:28:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 79604 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2016 15:28:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 79593 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jan 2016 15:28:04 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 15:28:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C4D151A0323 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 15:28:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.68 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.68 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id emRqLe7HGfem for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 15:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-f178.google.com (mail-yk0-f178.google.com [209.85.160.178]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id DD18F439F6 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 15:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f178.google.com with SMTP id x67so365768378ykd.2 for ; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 07:28:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ATl6CzCq8wMQPUkFz08v/EHlBkOYktWD/SwcHOW5UwM=; b=Gw3M0dN600vMPMSFRnEaH6fexNOiBY66ACZbonUf8rJ+DBGWAjW//mATpk3c+9YjNA 0GfV4au5p9ao86/xLUdlWx4K34kg6BKzgNbAWNisCcO1u44XGD/Iau9sxnQU9q5XDaeP Krxjb05uOsgo6KpqYIC+16jv24L6EpJMHZSMQfjIUluCv5hO4Wy5wxK/zPgMQu8vdUZd UifH6RttCk9z9wnBb7vAT31tHLmVqfilnQacUvSc2vICXIWHJt4K7FPnk0S5eGO7GtAM TCwE5BCuXV3RuJL8HthQ8MYMi3kDm4wNatmqpT16466Yu5G610WT4PVzoJE4mNXYqc+4 Aksg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.129.21.213 with SMTP id 204mr43498111ywv.70.1452266882618; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 07:28:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.13.210.66 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 07:28:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 15:28:02 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Ambiguous wording in http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#pmc From: sebb To: legal-discuss@apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Where should it be? On 8 January 2016 at 14:03, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Why is this in legal-discuss? > >> On Jan 8, 2016, at 5:47 AM, sebb wrote: >> >> The page http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#pmc >> >> says: >> >>>> >> The Project Management Committees are established by resolution of the >> Board, to be responsible for the active management of one or more >> communities, which are also identified by resolution of the Board. >> >> Each PMC consists of at least one officer of the ASF, who shall be >> designated chairperson, and may include one or more other members of >> the ASF. >> >> The chair of the PMC is appointed by the Board and is an officer of >> the ASF (Vice President). >> << >> >> I think the second para is confusing/plain wrong. I read it as follows: >> >> The first 2 phrases imply that there is a pool of officers who may >> become chairperson, when AIUI appointment to chairperson is what makes >> them an officer. >> >> The last phrase appears to suggest that only ASF members may be PMC members. >> However many PMCs include one or more non-members. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org