www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org>
Subject Re: FAQ: CCLA Optional?
Date Fri, 08 Jan 2016 04:09:34 GMT
(Sorry for this unnecessary reply - my mail client was not updating to show
the rest of the thread)

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Henri Yandell <bayard@apache.org> wrote:

> I think it'd be splitting hairs. We'd end up with "This may be, or may not
> be, beneficial to your employer. " - ie) it cancels out :)
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Henri Yandell <bayard@apache.org> wrote:
>> > Am I being blind, or is there not a FAQ saying something to the effect
>> of:
>>
>> Makes two of us. I don't this the understanding bellow (which I share
>> 99.9% btw)
>> is articulated anywhere on our sites.
>>
>> > * Is the CCLA required?
>> > * No, this document only needs to be signed if your employer requires
>> so.
>>
>> The 0.01% I don't quite share is the modality of the last sentence. I
>> think
>> we may need to communicate that it actually may be beneficial to the
>> employer to sign it. But perhaps I'm splitting hair here.
>>
>> > If not on the site, could I propose that something akin to that be
>> added to
>> > the FAQ and clarified in the CLA description?
>> >
>> >   http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas
>> >   http://www.apache.org/foundation/license-faq.html
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Roman.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message