www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org>
Subject Re: FAQ: CCLA Optional?
Date Fri, 08 Jan 2016 04:02:49 GMT
I think it'd be splitting hairs. We'd end up with "This may be, or may not
be, beneficial to your employer. " - ie) it cancels out :)

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Henri Yandell <bayard@apache.org> wrote:
> > Am I being blind, or is there not a FAQ saying something to the effect
> of:
>
> Makes two of us. I don't this the understanding bellow (which I share
> 99.9% btw)
> is articulated anywhere on our sites.
>
> > * Is the CCLA required?
> > * No, this document only needs to be signed if your employer requires so.
>
> The 0.01% I don't quite share is the modality of the last sentence. I think
> we may need to communicate that it actually may be beneficial to the
> employer to sign it. But perhaps I'm splitting hair here.
>
> > If not on the site, could I propose that something akin to that be added
> to
> > the FAQ and clarified in the CLA description?
> >
> >   http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas
> >   http://www.apache.org/foundation/license-faq.html
>
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
>

Mime
View raw message