Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C8F6118B51 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 08:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94934 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2015 08:37:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 94759 invoked by uid 500); 13 Oct 2015 08:37:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 94746 invoked by uid 99); 13 Oct 2015 08:37:14 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 08:37:14 +0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 107FE1A0494 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 08:37:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wijq8 with SMTP id q8so20289340wij.0 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 01:37:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.222.227 with SMTP id qp3mr41425604wjc.36.1444725432519; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 01:37:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.27.11.224 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 01:37:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <58A734F8-330D-411A-A895-90CBA65ADB45@jaguNET.com> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 10:37:11 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Finishing release policy codification From: Bertrand Delacretaz To: legal-discuss Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Marvin, On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: >>>...Just sending a gentle reminder that this proposal is pending... I have reviewed the first part of [1] up to the FAQ section. I have one comment: "Before casting +1 binding votes, individuals are REQUIRED...to compile as provided, and test the result on their own platform." In a multi-language project that's not possible, some people will check the java build, others the c++/windows version etc. I'd replace that with "and, as much as possible, compile as provided and test the result on their own platform.". And one suggestion: splitting the FAQ to a separate page would help make the main part stronger and more "sacred" IMO. -Bertrand [1] https://github.com/rectang/asfrelease/blob/draft3/release.md --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org