Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58A2E18CBF for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:30:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47813 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2015 16:29:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 47660 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2015 16:29:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 47648 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2015 16:29:45 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:29:45 +0000 Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:29:45 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sean Busbey (JIRA)" To: legal-discuss@apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-118) What is the definition of a "third-party" work? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14790666#comment-14790666 ] Sean Busbey commented on LEGAL-118: ----------------------------------- Also, can someone reconcile this guidance with the dev guide for assembling LICENSE/NOTICE files? from http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#bundle-asf-product {quote} BUNDLING OTHER ASF PRODUCTS It is not necessary to duplicate the line "This product includes software developed at the Apache Software Foundation...", though the ASF copyright line and any other portions of NOTICE must be considered for propagation. {quote} > What is the definition of a "third-party" work? > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: LEGAL-118 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-118 > Project: Legal Discuss > Issue Type: Question > Reporter: Patrick Hunt > Labels: Resolved.html > > In attempting to conform to the following: > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#required-third-party-notices > it's not clear to me what the definition of a "third party work" is, specifically in reference to Apache projects that build on each other. A concrete example: > Apache TLP "A" contains a jar file developed by Apache TLP "B". Is A required to treat B as a "third-party"? In other words, are all Apache projects "first party", and non-Apache projects "third party"? > I've looked at both of the following w/o finding an answer to my question: > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html > http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org