Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C251F189FF for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87772 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2015 15:36:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 87603 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2015 15:36:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 87593 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2015 15:36:05 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 15:36:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id CF2BD18034C for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:36:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.998 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.998 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FY-vZ_akt6Oz for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:36:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com (mail-ig0-f171.google.com [209.85.213.171]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 7D6F942B1A for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:36:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbut12 with SMTP id ut12so16422643igb.1 for ; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 08:36:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MK4rvot6oAgAwLYGhUOJl/RmharLRTNesXXloq8znNM=; b=mOoqV7voGkbiGJrX5EnIEqCeDFc0MTh2DnOJT1buPiQaEMzRwVFyDq7JED8e4XNE2J Hl/0HOyITQm8dqYa71qWNpEXd8+1TrMt7tkD4E4/ls3TixHdgwxrJt1V/V6ga3y+WI+b cU+VpCrFiEPI0iIVPCo4WhGnisVQO2sDEZAs6OHSXGPDeMMAA7dSfIMdv26M8dgK9hXW r4CO14plsoE//MfcoF0him6CcHelgMxKJNng3ItSBuChn4PfKpVtj8RjNiPPWwEUJAeg 7hrtrMVSuCWvz6v7zXLxjY/cVr+N7CX0tGg9F6JrKbIkDNL5XOFQ24G1FUMxD1hq6tqf N+4A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkbR/wQw/ySibdFFlVI14j6PS2YEuX6qsQSAEtVAO7LuOVlDxbihtXX6X65XCER0pYke7Tb MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.72.41 with SMTP id a9mr8654079igv.77.1441380963060; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 08:36:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.16.8 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 08:36:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <91FE2D8C-EF17-4CDD-A020-07E040654F34@apache.org> References: <91FE2D8C-EF17-4CDD-A020-07E040654F34@apache.org> Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 10:36:02 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NOTICE file From: William A Rowe Jr To: legal-discuss@apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdca41e4a3391051eeda809 --047d7bdca41e4a3391051eeda809 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > Hi there, > > I have a couple of questions about the NOTICE file. In this page: > > http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html > > it says that it should include the following text, suitably modified to > reflect the product name and year(s) of distribution of the current and > past versions of the product: > > Apache [PRODUCT_NAME]Copyright [yyyy] The Apache Software Foundation > > As I understand it, it means that every year, if there is a release, the > year part needs to be modified to add the new year, e.g., 2010-2015 if > there is a release in 2015. How much of a problem is it if a release comes > out without that year field updated? > Unnecessary to have a span of years, and now considered improper form. The current year (when this specific package is published) is the only year necessary. The copyrights on individual bits probably go back many years before the first ASF release, but what is important here is the copyright of the collective work that is your current release (here and now). > Also, I noticed that Hadoop omits that header altogether and has only: > > This product includes software developed by The Apache Software > Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). > This is incorrect, where is the Copyright claim? --047d7bdca41e4a3391051eeda809 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On F= ri, Sep 4, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Flavio Junqueira <fpj@apache.org> = wrote:
Hi there,

I have a couple of questions about the NOTIC= E file. In this page:


it says that it should includ= e the following text, suitably modified to reflect the product name and yea= r(s)=20 of distribution of the current and past versions of the product:
Apache [PRODUCT_NAME=
]
Copyright [yyyy] =
The Apache Software Foundation
As I understand it, it means that every year, if there is= a release, the year part needs to be modified to add the new year, e.g., 2= 010-2015 if there is a release in 2015. How much of a problem is it if a re= lease comes out without that year field updated?=C2=A0

Unnecessary to have a span of years, and now consid= ered improper form.=C2=A0 The current year (when this specific package is p= ublished) is the only year necessary.=C2=A0 The copyrights on individual bi= ts probably go back many years before the first ASF release, but what is im= portant here is the copyright of the collective work that is your current r= elease (here and now).
=C2=A0
Also, I noticed that H= adoop omits that header altogether and has only:

<= span style=3D"white-space:pre-wrap"> This product includes software = developed by The Apache Software
Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).=C2=A0

T= his is incorrect, where is the Copyright claim?

--047d7bdca41e4a3391051eeda809--