www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sean Busbey (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-118) What is the definition of a "third-party" work?
Date Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:25:46 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14790661#comment-14790661

Sean Busbey commented on LEGAL-118:

Could we re-prioritize getting this written up in the FAQ? It would have simplified the license
fix-up HBase just went through, but I missed this jira.

> What is the definition of a "third-party" work?
> -----------------------------------------------
>                 Key: LEGAL-118
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-118
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Patrick Hunt
>              Labels: Resolved.html
> In attempting to conform to the following:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#required-third-party-notices
> it's not clear to me what the definition of a "third party work" is, specifically in
reference to Apache projects that build on each other. A concrete example:
> Apache TLP "A" contains a jar file developed by Apache TLP "B". Is A required to treat
B as a "third-party"? In other words, are all Apache projects "first party", and non-Apache
projects "third party"?
> I've looked at both of the following w/o finding an answer to my question:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
> http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message