Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D307AAC5-72C5-47BE-B57E-ECFF6E022EC8@apache.org>
References: <0d8b01d0cfb6$c65b3cd0$5311b670$@rosenlaw.com>
	<8DDCF798-4621-4854-97EB-05B611098056@apache.org>
	<0da601d0cfc5$08b7e200$1a27a600$@rosenlaw.com>
	<00f301d0cfed$471435d0$d53ca170$@apache.org>
	<CAAS6=7h7Rrv+e5qUtic9jb0AXuLmdwgB6f9SCxrTHEm9_trY_A@mail.gmail.com>
	<15146C02-4FB3-4BD5-94E4-0EBC4CEB93AA@jaguNET.com>
	<122601d0d44a$459845a0$d0c8d0e0$@rosenlaw.com>
	<D307AAC5-72C5-47BE-B57E-ECFF6E022EC8@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:01:49 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAAS6=7iqi=-OR2hCvJgs0V9x8FdbR36Tb-wKJJ+goowAwfeBsA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: InfoWorld article on LibreOffice and OpenOffice
From: Marvin Humphrey <marvin@rectangular.com>
To: "legal-discuss@apache.org" <legal-discuss@apache.org>
Cc: Lawrence Rosen <lrosen@rosenlaw.com>, orcmid@apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho
<rec@apache.org> wrote:

> If we allowed to integrate patches under MPL, we could just as well put the
> whole project accepting these patches under MPL -because managing multiple
> licenses within a single source file is not practicable and having a large
> number of foreign-licensed files makes refactoring impracticable.

Right, so how have LO managed the integration of Apache-licensed content when
the result would be multiply-licensed source files?

Marvin Humphrey

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org