Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12CDC181A2 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:37:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29410 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2015 16:37:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 29242 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2015 16:37:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 29228 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2015 16:37:57 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:37:57 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.12] (ip-178-203-23-159.hsi10.unitymediagroup.de [178.203.23.159]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 4D95E1A009B; Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:37:55 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: Google Analytics at ASF From: Richard Eckart de Castilho In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 18:37:48 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <999CE813-D1DE-4265-97FB-8F299AA8E46A@apache.org> References: <557D7443-6A14-443F-BEF3-F3C86C0DAA7C@jaguNET.com> <562CA920-7FD5-4E20-AA0F-C5F300D06789@apache.org> To: legal-discuss@apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) On 23.08.2015, at 17:57, Bertrand Delacretaz = wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho > wrote: >> ...Could anybody please briefly summarize or point out if there >> are any specific things that a PMC that wants to use Google >> Analytics has to observe - or can the PMC "just do it"?... >=20 > I'm not sure if we have foundation-wide guidelines about this but IMO > http://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/privacy-policy.html is a good way of > being clear with our website visitors. My understanding is that the Google themselves require a privacy = statement on those pages that make use of GA - so that is mandatory. But the = thread [1] mentions other points: - Is it required to make the collected statistics public? http://markmail.org/message/7oiekanas7jdzhc4 I understand that Jackrabbit set up a monthly publishing of the stats to = the dev list but is it mandatory to do that? - Google's terms of services regarding the use of brand names / = trademarks http://markmail.org/message/36fczs4nrxfxldod Nobody seems to have answered to this mail from Marshall.=20 Independent from said thread, it appears that no obligation is felt to = comply with an European directive to allow users to opt-out (or rather opt-in) = to cookie usage: = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directive_on_Privacy_and_Electronic_Communic= ations At least, I cannot remember having seen and kind of popup on Apache = sites so far asking me to accept the privacy guidelines and/or offering me to opt out = of cookie use (I regularly see such things on other sites). Is there any stance towards anonymizing the data sent to Google?=20 ga('set', 'anonymizeIp', true); My understanding from various sources in German is that German law = requires that the IP is anonymized. Here is one in English. = http://www.iubenda.com/blog/2013/11/13/ip-anonymization-google-analytics-p= rivacy/ So being a German citizen, would I have to obey that when setting up a = website for an Apache project (I mean with the ASF being a Delaware corporation...)? Cheers, -- Richard [1] http://markmail.org/message/36fczs4nrxfxldod= --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org