Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6066E175EA for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 16:46:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72590 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2015 16:46:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 72460 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2015 16:46:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 72449 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2015 16:46:04 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 16:46:04 +0000 Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 16:46:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Henri Yandell (JIRA)" To: legal-discuss@apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Closed] (LEGAL-207) May Apache projects have dependencies with prohibited licenses in test code? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Henri Yandell closed LEGAL-207. ------------------------------- Resolution: Done Closing this. Specific use cases should have their own JIRA issues. As a general question, the answer per resolved.html is no (i.e. there is no exception for 'test' scope). > May Apache projects have dependencies with prohibited licenses in test code? > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LEGAL-207 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-207 > Project: Legal Discuss > Issue Type: Question > Reporter: Steve Rowe > > Spinoff from LEGAL-206. > Are ASF projects allowed to distribute test source code that will not compile without a 3rd party dependency that has a prohibited license? > For example, Java test code that includes lines of the form: > {code:java} > import com.example.Myclass; > ... > Myclass clazz = new Myclass(); > {code} > where the definition of {{com.example.Myclass}} is included in a 3rd party dependency that has a prohibited license. > While most products are unlikely to include compiled test source code with convenience binaries (though some projects do, including Apache Lucene's "Lucene Core" and Solr products), the ASF distributes source, so non-inclusion in binary distributions should not affect the answer here. > This question is not directly addressed anywhere that I can find. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org