www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jochen Wiedmann (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-142) Implement/rewrite some Scala code in our Apache Project
Date Tue, 21 Jul 2015 10:54:05 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14634943#comment-14634943
] 

Jochen Wiedmann commented on LEGAL-142:
---------------------------------------

Are you adding those Scala files to the source repository/distribution? Or, are you just reading
them for the purpose of a rewrite, and add Java files, which are written by yourself? If the
latter, then I don't see any actions that must be taken.


> Implement/rewrite some Scala code in our Apache Project
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-142
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-142
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Sandro Martini
>
> Hi all,
> I'm thinking to add in Pivot some features that exist in the Scala language ( http://www.scala-lang.org
), to simplify transition/integration of users coming from a Scala background.
> Scala is licensed in a similar way of BSD ( http://www.scala-lang.org/node/146 , http://www.scala-lang.org/node/249
) ... I already had some discussion in Apache mailing lists on this some time ago, and even
other Apache projects are using Scala, so there shouldn't be problems.
> And adding their copyright and related info in our project NOTICE file should be enough
...
> But my real question is here:
> some things to reimplement (and in some cases extend our already existing classes, maybe
with the same method names) in Pivot are simple class definitions, sometimes even only interfaces
(empty class), and of course I don't want to steal anyone code.
> In this case more than copying code, I have to rewrite it in Java, so our sources could
be a little different.
> So even if our code could be different from the original, but I plan to reuse some of
their intellectual work (to design interfaces and classes) should be good to put some reference
to Scala even in our NOTICE file and copy their license, right ? Or in this case could be
something non required ?
> And last (if needed), something like this could be good for NOTICE ?
> This product contains code derived from Scala, rewrittedn in Java code.
> This is our related JIRA issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-799
> Some link to interested code, just for info:
> http://www.scala-lang.org/api/current/index.html#scala.Option
> http://www.scala-lang.org/api/current/index.html#scala.Some
> http://www.scala-lang.org/api/current/index.html#scala.None$
> http://www.scala-lang.org/api/current/index.html#scala.collection.Map
> and maybe other things (but more on "concepts" than code), like "reactive programming",
"actors", etc ...
> Thank you very much for your help.
> Regards,
> Sandro



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message