www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Creative Commons BY 4.0 license compatible?
Date Thu, 30 Jul 2015 23:49:19 GMT
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Lawrence Rosen <lrosen@rosenlaw.com> wrote:

> > I'm merely stating that that is a restriction, and that that restriction
> is not present
> > in the Apache License, Version 2.
> It is not a restriction on anything at all.
> The MPL license demands that you comply with the Firefox terms and
> conditions, just as the Apache License demands that you comply with the
> Apache terms and conditions. But they are both FOSS licenses!

Great. Let's reword the underlying statement of the ASF's position on this

"The ASF does not want any downstream users to have demands imposed upon
them, beyond those of ALv2."

That same wording can be used to delineate Category A and B licenses. And
that wording *is* the current policy of the Foundation. ... Larger Works
that demand a source code release is against our desires.


View raw message