Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E48EF17EDA for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 13:39:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19730 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2015 13:39:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 19564 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2015 13:39:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 19549 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2015 13:39:51 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 13:39:51 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id F27A71A439A for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 13:39:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PAOjlPz_eELV for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 13:39:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f175.google.com (mail-ie0-f175.google.com [209.85.223.175]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id B5424275EB for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 13:39:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iebgx4 with SMTP id gx4so13198981ieb.0 for ; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 06:38:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ds5g2xV+BEpqEDJrPsDdytvDZIiQ4kpBQKivaEyjW6g=; b=cA4wWanFK0G+woUiU0DaG0oHM/UrEhm5+p6GMrMNoiHOa04kP6qKIq57Eb5X4rU7or oyaVz6yuPhbV8iIiCCwE2KZJAdrHLCWe3R7rWQ+A5IJDPKNqrKyxVgawg2fQe/T6cbTr 8U8+B6weTWFHAy3Dz69OMTX3HM9MJgSCL8jNQ7ZfZJaIhJLh/sGRxBl+PbNK5Qr2FFpa m/WPXwBAhba1X7Go6m7s49hy/cm62bwfKDq+UomM6bw2jNdcFQ6o8ti0FY7l4b8iSgZ6 6MQA3qCVnXo3pBzojI6PwvjMNuxxZ5w34aexdnczogDhXmLwGjCEwxrYfOGZLnY27HxY aAkQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkL2EY2f8Ek/NQYbj3UTp10PmvWJPs21JkPdPi0qgDDyIG7SQanUx07y1wqAg6ozqkEkmYV MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.12.102 with SMTP id x6mr27341120igb.20.1433338691952; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 06:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.190.195 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 06:38:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [76.252.112.72] In-Reply-To: <556EFA30.7030602@shanecurcuru.org> References: <0ebc01d093f7$197e7ef0$4c7b7cd0$@rosenlaw.com> <019001d09d86$aee7f500$0cb7df00$@rosenlaw.com> <66710DF6-A88A-44D0-85C4-794E3C0E95AC@pobox.com> <300DB301-A009-489B-ADFB-ED3919B1AFBD@pobox.com> <8CC10372-468B-4E28-9A0D-F8A2929DD9AE@jaguNET.com> <556EFA30.7030602@shanecurcuru.org> Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 08:38:11 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposal: Disclosure of patents by Apache projects From: William A Rowe Jr To: legal-discuss@apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0118362893e0e905179d2b1b --089e0118362893e0e905179d2b1b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > On 6/3/15 8:44 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > But what's the point of any of this? There's no reason to require > Sneaky Author to enumerate anything because via contribution via the AL, > they have granted a license to anything they have necessarily infringed by > the contribution (or combined contribution and existing work) > > > > And I as the recipient don't really care - I know that via the patent > grant in the AL, Sneaky Author can't come after me for any patents they > hold (enumerated or not) that read on the work they contributed to. > > > > Is there a real problem we're trying to solve? > > I'm not aware of any Apache project asking this question, no. It seems > Bill might have a case related to this thread, which we can address when > it comes up. > Indeed, there is no sneaky author. The patents are public filings. No need for tinfoil hats or detection gadgets. Those patent use rights are granted, by the very design of the AL, to every downstream consumer. Apparently, none of you spend too much time with your corp-consumer legal teams. It's brutal. Pretty much everything out there, IP-wise, bollixes the works. Stray non-conforming license? That's out. Stray patent claim? Straight out. So yes, there is a project which is trying to offer code-with-patent-license to the ASF, and has succeeded at their CCLA plus CLAs and would like to wokr out the best way to inform / reassure users that these particular patent claims are known to apply and are granted for use to whatever downstream consumer wants to use the code. Is this really so difficult? --089e0118362893e0e905179d2b1b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On W= ed, Jun 3, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Shane Curcuru <asf@shanecurcuru.org>= wrote:
On 6/3/15= 8:44 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> But what's the point of any of this?=C2=A0 There's no reason t= o require Sneaky Author to enumerate anything because via contribution via = the AL, they have granted a license to anything they have necessarily infri= nged by the contribution (or combined contribution and existing work)
>
> And I as the recipient don't really care - I know that via the pat= ent grant in the AL, Sneaky Author can't come after me for any patents = they hold (enumerated or not) that read on the work they contributed to. >
> Is there a real problem we're trying to solve?

I'm not aware of any Apache project asking this question, no.=C2= =A0 It seems
Bill might have a case related to this thread, which we can address when it comes up.

Indeed, there is no sneaky= author.=C2=A0 The patents are public filings.=C2=A0 No=C2=A0
nee= d for tinfoil hats or detection gadgets.=C2=A0 Those patent use rights are= =C2=A0
granted, by the very design of the AL, to every downstream= consumer.

Apparently, none of you spend too much = time with your corp-consumer
legal teams.=C2=A0 It's brutal.

Pretty much everything out there, IP-wise, bollixes the w= orks.=C2=A0 Stray
non-conforming license?=C2=A0 That's out.= =C2=A0 Stray patent claim?=C2=A0 Straight out.

So = yes, there is a project which is trying to offer code-with-patent-license
to the ASF, and has succeeded at their CCLA plus CLAs and would li= ke
to wokr out the best way to inform / reassure users that these= particular
patent claims are known to apply and are granted for = use to whatever
downstream consumer wants to use the code.
<= div>
Is this really so difficult?

<= /div>
--089e0118362893e0e905179d2b1b--