Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7374517BCB for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 12:14:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24401 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2015 12:14:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 24237 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2015 12:14:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 24223 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2015 12:14:15 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 12:14:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4142F1A4429 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 12:14:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.653 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.653 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.net Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G88YQ8PCy-es for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 12:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resqmta-ch2-04v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-04v.sys.comcast.net [69.252.207.36]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id C2894428FF for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 12:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resomta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.107]) by resqmta-ch2-04v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id boDs1q0082Ka2Q501oDwxo; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 12:13:56 +0000 Received: from [192.168.199.10] ([69.251.80.74]) by resomta-ch2-11v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id boDw1q0041cCKD901oDwyN; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 12:13:56 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) Subject: Re: Proposal: Disclosure of patents by Apache projects From: Jim Jagielski In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 08:13:55 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6E1B7C71-186E-4CF6-9A65-BA1819FB82B4@jaguNET.com> References: <0ebc01d093f7$197e7ef0$4c7b7cd0$@rosenlaw.com> <0ffa01d09426$f7fb8b30$e7f2a190$@rosenlaw.com> <2085234F-FA5C-4637-90F0-35A700D677C3@oracle.com> <107401d0943d$15857c90$409075b0$@rosenlaw.com> <2cc201d09bca$9ad08400$d0718c00$@rosenlaw.com> <2d8001d09bef$f1f049d0$d5d0dd70$@rosenlaw.com> To: legal-discuss@apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1433333636; bh=GuzzTwbjUPNUtoTrrBlDAukz1puez9InwLcg8+ZotpM=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date: Message-Id:To; b=Vh4mJibnalhUB5mTLObEM/Yt+8xvLcawMSYoiY5sB71FGV8iCM/A47Wg+8+tkM+nG rwJWT53D2sXwwtZQfaOkwiW43aqBOA+c7ABjogN1c6F+SXAWll+EQPOdwevy6vVcWo C1taeZfo2l973LWIRj+m5Lv1Y2K/m08m/ak2lTyURtprHArDKnDnkOFvF3wG/2Cq0B qxV10ABj8jYG01cznAziAW2KUfu9clHp7Mzho5QMGGNe6qzrSm7Ki4zzqrF19dCMEV eNWh94vj6BubCRlZ7SxUZwoAAkd1OXK0phD9mganJ6s8sJELW+4UkAmlcxU7Cb/WWt T8bgoIzjkJwnA== For the sake of discussion, certainly not NOTICE, which has a very specific function. So README or PATENTS or some other file makes sense. > On Jun 2, 2015, at 5:44 PM, William A Rowe Jr = wrote: >=20 > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Roy T. Fielding = wrote: >> On May 31, 2015, at 3:20 PM, Lawrence Rosen = wrote: >>=20 >> [Responses to three board members in one email. :-) ] >> =20 >> Greg Stein wrote: >> > Thus, to water out random claims of infringement from random = developers, we must wait until the patent holder *informs* us that we = (likely) infringe. Until the patent holder wants to assert that, then I = don't think we're qualified to make *any* judgement, including whether = it is important/relevant to provide notice. >> =20 >> Nobody is concerned about "random claims of infringement from random = developers." Or rather, "if you are concerned about such a claim, then = say so in the NOTICE file. If not, move it to the trash." Nothing more = is required from ASF or its members and contributors. I would ask only = for open disclosure within Apache projects of patents that seem = interesting to the project PMC itself.=20 >> =20 >> There is no risk to ASF from such disclosure. Under ALv2, disclosures = of potentially relevant patents come with no warranties from ASF.=20 >=20 > ALv2 covers our software products, not our disclosures. We are just as = liable for our statements as any human being, and any statement we might = make is evidentiary for both us and our downstream recipients. >=20 > So let me ask what might be a blindingly obvious question. A handful = of awarded patents apply to a code base submitted to the ASF, licensed = under the AL by the patent holder, patent rights are conveyed. >=20 > Do we note the specific patent numbers/titles? If so, where? README? = NOTICE? PATENTS? >=20 >=20 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org