Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7EE8017762 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 00:09:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89812 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2015 23:09:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 89645 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2015 23:09:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 89634 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2015 23:09:24 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 23:09:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3EC0F181A4E for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 23:09:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.121 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.121 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Pnz02jNft5r for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 23:09:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 464F7428FF for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 23:09:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbgq6 with SMTP id gq6so152426689wgb.3 for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 16:09:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lzKyZ26Z+/ifl2gXdLMjeapUgQqS+aIHIaq+pGqLPvY=; b=jts1NyDpW8zS0yQtlhBTojwxONSM16HhvSJR3auNGBs/0Op7ocxqJBKV8KxXVIsq1y LHedbblNKMGNXd4R3iYr1ICM8+QPBJiWPO4Ow3tDbeLjVeX6S5vLsXAtGZxDpgYaGIiS usWzMm8gvzOuk4bIGTkjZrPqMQQ0pCBTvMnRPy1SPXGrRSsrpvdxTRojSS9XcmB6GwMp A0e1sJ3NzSYSbqUoybuDSPtkfhQNoZ/9j+xd36rsRbwBgZFfSw3dvvT3LQDjnbcvC211 3lElS8gvQOCbnJK2Ir5aOSns/zO0Y5kPoFQYFDBOBM3ow+zpGvu/jHbSYR2fhVZc6ZJr NtQw== X-Received: by 10.180.76.134 with SMTP id k6mr7990362wiw.43.1433286562414; Tue, 02 Jun 2015 16:09:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.29] (AMontsouris-651-1-28-117.w82-123.abo.wanadoo.fr. [82.123.87.117]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id vz2sm19681382wjc.18.2015.06.02.16.09.20 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Jun 2015 16:09:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <556E37A0.4050000@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 01:09:20 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?RW1tYW51ZWwgTMOpY2hhcm55?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: legal-discuss@apache.org Subject: Re: Proposal: Disclosure of patents by Apache projects References: <0ebc01d093f7$197e7ef0$4c7b7cd0$@rosenlaw.com> <0ffa01d09426$f7fb8b30$e7f2a190$@rosenlaw.com> <2085234F-FA5C-4637-90F0-35A700D677C3@oracle.com> <107401d0943d$15857c90$409075b0$@rosenlaw.com> <2cc201d09bca$9ad08400$d0718c00$@rosenlaw.com> <2d8001d09bef$f1f049d0$d5d0dd70$@rosenlaw.com> <00c301d09d6f$a880ac00$f9820400$@rosenlaw.com> In-Reply-To: <00c301d09d6f$a880ac00$f9820400$@rosenlaw.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le 02/06/15 22:06, Lawrence Rosen a =C3=A9crit : > To the rest of us in Apache projects, though, your expert opinions > about patents are what matters most. So when one of our respected > members says "this patent is BS, IMHO" then I am likely not to be > worried tonight. I would much wish that he had said something of more > technical value, and that he was willing to say it aloud in a NOTICE > file that bears no ASF warranties.=20 What for ?? Seriously, I explained why I do think why this patent is plain BS because of existing prior act, what more do we need ? Why should I spend hours writing in correct english and legal terminology (something I'm not capabale of producing) in a NOTICE that some stupid company decided it was useful to pay some of their employees to fulfill a piece of document which is a waste of their time and their money ? Rgeardless of the US laws, which is still in the process of deciding that patnenting software patents is just as useful as patenting mathematic formulas, something that many countries in the world have already stated, it's not ours to warn our users about hypothetical risks that does not even exist. Simply because *if* someone can patent some software, then we can shutdown The ASF. Bottom line: not my problem, not even a problem. Let's move on. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org