www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dennis E. Hamilton (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-24) Scripts, source, and Reciprocal Licenses
Date Tue, 02 Jun 2015 15:01:18 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-24?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14569223#comment-14569223
] 

Dennis E. Hamilton commented on LEGAL-24:
-----------------------------------------

I notice that this issue thread manages to overlook the proviso concerning optionality with
regard to such dependencies.  This seems to remain relevant, as would be the (optional) inclusion
in builds or as something like a plug-in but not inclusion in the released source.

> Scripts, source, and Reciprocal Licenses
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-24
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-24
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Sam Ruby
>
> The current draft of the Third Party Licensing Policy (0.53) contains the following text
under the section concerning Reciprocal Licenses:
> Note that works written in a scripting language without a binary form cannot be included
in any ASF product under one of these licenses (see Transition and Exceptions).
> We need to decide if this truly is necessary.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message