www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: Gazornenplatz
Date Thu, 04 Jun 2015 11:28:20 GMT
Only because it is easy to spell and rolls off the tongue well.

> On Jun 3, 2015, at 6:05 PM, Lawrence Rosen <lrosen@rosenlaw.com> wrote:
> 
> I call this a NOTICE file for convenience and obstinacy. I believe that Jim Jagielski
now calls it a GAZORNENPLATZ. /Larry
>  
>  
> From: William A Rowe Jr [mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 2:58 PM
> To: legal-discuss@apache.org; Lawrence Rosen
> Subject: Re: Proposal Next: Disclosure of standards Implemented by Apache projects
>  
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Lawrence Rosen <lrosen@rosenlaw.com> wrote:
>> [This was mentioned before but I repeat it as a separate proposal to "encourage"
yet more conversation here. :-)  ]
>>  
>> Please remember that a NOTICE file should also contain a list of all industry standards
implemented in that Apache aggregation.
>>  
>> Some standards organization licenses REQUIRE such notices of their contributions.
I think it is a good practice regardless.
>  
> I have always placed these in the README, or often times CHANGES,
> as it is informational guidance to the user.
>  
> If an implementation license demands advertising, such as the license
> for a header file we distribute, then it does belong in NOTICE per the
> terms of the license.
>  
> I believe the preference has been to avoid NOTICE pollution and dilution.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message