www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Richard Eckart de Castilho <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Gazornenplatz (off-topic)
Date Thu, 04 Jun 2015 16:32:43 GMT
Just in case anybody else was wondering where this "Gazornenplatz" might be coming from...



-- Richard

On 04.06.2015, at 13:28, Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> wrote:

> Only because it is easy to spell and rolls off the tongue well.
>> On Jun 3, 2015, at 6:05 PM, Lawrence Rosen <lrosen@rosenlaw.com> wrote:
>> I call this a NOTICE file for convenience and obstinacy. I believe that Jim Jagielski
now calls it a GAZORNENPLATZ. /Larry
>> From: William A Rowe Jr [mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net] 
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 2:58 PM
>> To: legal-discuss@apache.org; Lawrence Rosen
>> Subject: Re: Proposal Next: Disclosure of standards Implemented by Apache projects
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Lawrence Rosen <lrosen@rosenlaw.com> wrote:
>>> [This was mentioned before but I repeat it as a separate proposal to "encourage"
yet more conversation here. :-)  ]
>>> Please remember that a NOTICE file should also contain a list of all industry
standards implemented in that Apache aggregation.
>>> Some standards organization licenses REQUIRE such notices of their contributions.
I think it is a good practice regardless.
>> I have always placed these in the README, or often times CHANGES,
>> as it is informational guidance to the user.
>> If an implementation license demands advertising, such as the license
>> for a header file we distribute, then it does belong in NOTICE per the
>> terms of the license.
>> I believe the preference has been to avoid NOTICE pollution and dilution.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message